Sunday, March 31, 2024

Easter Morning Grunt Work (Easter)

Mark: The Urgent! Gospel
EASTER SUNDAY: NOW - we run toward resurrection
Mark 16:1-8


Watch the video:


...or listen to audio:


...or download a printer-friendly PDF file [click here]

...or read it online here: 

Of the four Gospel accounts of Jesus’ resurrection,
Mark’s version is the most discomforting and disturbing,
and discombobulates the most Bible scholars.
So, naturally, it’s my favorite.

We get more out of the Bible when we have to wrestle with it.
What befuddles us is how Mark ends—
so abruptly . . . and so unsatisfyingly.

The King James, and other old Bibles have a longer ending for Mark.
But after the King James was published,
more ancient scrolls and fragments were discovered.
Turns out the oldest and most reliable manuscripts,
have a shorter ending.
Most Bible scholars agree,
the original Gospel of Mark ended at verse 8,
by saying the women (quote) “fled from the tomb,
for terror and amazement had seized them,
and they said nothing to anyone, for they were afraid.”
End of story. End of book.

At some point, maybe early in the 2nd century, we think,
well-meaning editors finished Mark’s story.
They added 12 more verses, combining parts
of the Matthew, Luke, and John resurrection story,
and tacking it on to Mark.

Since Mark ended with three women running from the tomb
and not telling a soul,
it’s kind of obvious why an editor wanted to finish the story.
The question is, why Mark didn’t.
_____________________

So let’s think about resurrection in first-century Jewish context,
before it became the stuff of sunrises and white lilies,
and white-robed angels strolling in the garden.

Now, I love the tradition of filling Easter with
blooms and colors and songs and Alleluias!
I love it, and embrace it. Don’t get me wrong.
There is goodness and joy and beauty
in God’s victory over death.
Easter is, to the core, a story of hope and triumph.

But . . . let’s not forget what it was like, in the moment,
as Mark brilliantly told the story.
Remember, we assume Mark’s Gospel emerged
from Jesus-followers in Rome,
during the Roman war against the Jews.
So maybe Mark had a deeper grasp
on how terrifying and complex resurrection is,
for people in the crushing grip of a violent empire.

Of course, there was deep joy.
The disciples loved Jesus, and were thrilled to have him back.
But think about what else it meant.
There’s a reason they were terrified.

They’d gone into the previous week thinking this was the end
of Roman occupation and oppression.
The Empire would be chased out of Judea,
they would be free at last,
Jesus would be enthroned in Jerusalem,
and usher in an era of peace.

But their hope came crashing down.
Jesus was defeated and humiliated by Rome,
publicly crucified,
suffering a barbaric execution like any other insurrectionist.

I think by Sunday the disciples were already considering
how to reset their lives.
Their goal was to disappear into the woodwork,
become invisible,
get on with some other way
of making a life for themselves in a brutal Empire.
One of the other Gospels tells how Peter did exactly that,
convincing some of his former fishing buddies
to go back out on the Sea of Galilee,
and pick up where they left off three years earlier.
I imagine the rest went through a similar thought process.
It’s called disillusionment.
“Okay. So we got Jesus wrong.
We can’t take back the last three years.
Let’s get real, and figure out a new life.”

So . . . when news began to sink in that the tomb was empty,
and that Jesus, in some way or another, was still with them,
that completely disoriented them again.
Because Rome had not gone anywhere!
Herod still lived in the palace.
Soldiers were still everywhere.
The religious hierarchy, who were threatened by Jesus,
were still in power.
The resurrection seemingly had zero impact on Jesus’ enemies.

So . . . if Jesus was still alive,
and his enemies were still in power,
and doubling down on their oppression,
it meant the disciples could not disappear
and make a new life.
Their mission was not yet accomplished.
They had to re-engage the freedom struggle.

That’s asking a lot for recently traumatized people.

It’s pretty easy for us, 2000 years later,
to see hope and joy in resurrection.
But were the disciples willing to live the nightmare all over again?
Even if Jesus showed up in the flesh, and built another following,
the powers of the world
would have every one of them in the cross-hairs . . . again.
Their end would be even more violent and horrific,
than a single crucifixion.
Were they ready to risk that?

That, I believe, was the terror that seized them.
_____________________

You know, celebrating resurrection is wonderful.
But it never means the struggle is over,
or the hard work is done.
It might only be getting started.

In some ways, this short story in Mark,
of the women going to the tomb on the first day of the week,
is a perfect metaphor for what’s required
of us today as Jesus followers.
What’s required is to show up for the hard stuff.

We have a misleading mental image
of the two Mary’s and Salomé going to the tomb.
We picture a Sunday morning walk in a garden,
flowers and blooming trees everywhere,
sun rays peeking over the horizon,
a perfect sunburst against the blue sky.
We imagine three women sprinkling perfume and spices
on Jesus’ wrapped up body,
spending a few quiet and sacred moments in grief,
paying homage to a dear friend.
That’s a nice image. But it’s not true.

This was no stroll in a garden.
This was the first day of the week;
day after Sabbath, same as our Monday morning.
They were there to do a very unpleasant job.
As if Monday morning wouldn’t be bad enough
after a horrifying weekend,
they had agonizingly difficult work to do first thing.
This was grunt work—in the extreme.
Monday morning grunt work.
The job of these women was to unwrap Jesus’ lifeless body,
dead and stiff in the tomb two days,
wash it,
rub in the necessary anointing oil and spices,
their way of embalming,
and re-wrap the body and put it back where it belonged.
Normally this was done soon after death.
But the circumstances of Jesus’ crucifixion didn’t allow that.

So they were intent on this one thing—one hard job to do—
to give Jesus a proper burial,
and then to get out of there,
and get on with sorting out what life looks like
without Jesus in it.

But instead, they found an empty tomb, with an angel inside it.
A whole new disturbing reality was foisted on them.
It overtook them.
It seized them.
_____________________

We will have a better grasp of Easter,
when we realize what it took for these women,
just to show up and do the grunt work that needed to be done.
They did this while their hope was still crushed.
They didn’t want to do it.
But it was the right thing to do.

We live in a world today that needs a lot of grunt work from us.
There is injustice everywhere we look.
Violence and hatred and inhumanity is pervasive.
The work of repairing this world—
which is the mission of God—
and which we are invited into as partners—
is grueling work.

It is not a stroll in the garden.
Sunrises and blooming lilies may be few and far between.
The work may be difficult and off-putting,
maybe tedious,
certainly risky,
and maybe not with any immediate reward or payback.
We may not feel like doing it today.
We might even feel hopeless.
It just happens to be the right thing to do.

So, because of the ultimate hope we have,
because of God’s victory over death and the grave,
because of the Holy Spirit of God breathing
strength and courage into us,
we go on, we keep at it, we keep showing up,
Monday morning or Tuesday or any day.
Most days it might seem like nothing happened.
But every now and again,
we encounter resurrection.
And we are overwhelmed.
That is the good news of Easter.
Let’s celebrate today,
and be ready for the grunt work tomorrow.
God helping us.

—Phil Kniss, March 31, 2024

[To leave a comment, click on "comments" link below]

Sunday, March 17, 2024

First word, last word, same word (Lent 5)

Mark: The Urgent! Gospel
LENT 5: NOW - we prepare for the great reveal
Mark 13:1-8, 24-37


Watch the video:


...or listen to audio:


...or download a printer-friendly PDF file [click here]

...or read it online here: 

Today, again, I have the joyful privilege of expounding on
one of my very favorite types of biblical literature—
apocalyptic—
the kind of Bible verses that
scare the you-know-what out of most people . . .
and that, when I was a kid, used to keep me up at night,
sweating bullets,
and having bad dreams . . .
and that describe in horrifying detail
the terrible things that will happen in the end times,
and why we all need to live our lives on edge,
ready for the disaster to come.

I would thank my lucky stars for the chance to preach from this text—
except, those stars fall from skies in this text,
and the sun and moon go dark.

You think I’m being facetious,
calling this kind of text one of my favorite to preach on?
Well . . . I’m not.
You want to know why it’s my favorite?
Well . . . I’ll tell you.

I just love helping us think differently about scripture.
I love taking texts that we (and I’m including myself here)
that we have long misinterpreted and therefore,
have been too afraid of, to take a second look,
and so we ignore them.
It’s our loss to ignore life-affirming scripture—
which is what this is—
just because we don’t understand it.

So let’s dig in.
And first, context reminder.

Mark is likely being written from Rome,
from the heart of the Roman Empire,
right from the belly of the beast,
written by a community of Jewish exiles,
who were followers of Jesus,
led by the likes of Peter and John Mark,
and it was 30-plus years after the time of Jesus,
while the Empire, in whose capital they resided,
was in the process of trying to destroy their people,
their Jewish religion, and all their sacred buildings.

When these apocalyptic words were put to paper,
Jerusalem was about to, or already had,
fallen into rubble at the hands of the Empire.

We should never read Mark without keeping that in mind.
We should give careful thought
to what motivated the writers and editors of these words,
and to whom they were first intended to be read.
That’s the first important step to keep us from
misreading what is meant to be good news,
and turning it into bad news.

So, if you lived in the heart of the militaristic Roman Empire,
and you were either a Roman citizen empathetic toward the Jews,
or you were a Jew yourself, and feeling threatened,
or you were already a follower of Jesus,
and trying to figure out what you had gotten yourself into,
then you, too, would have read these words of Jesus,
and been filled with hope and joy.
You would have spent zero time
worrying or sweating or having nightmares
about the terror that was going to befall you,
because you, as an individual, had sinned,
and were on the wrong side of God’s anger.

We should read it like the first readers read it.

So Mark has Jesus predicting the destruction of the Temple,
in vv. 1 and 2.
Now, the destruction of the Temple
would have thrown all Jews off-balance,
spiritually, socially, politically, emotionally.
In every way, it would have been devastating—
for mainstream Jews and Jewish leaders,
and for the sect within Judaism that saw Jesus as Messiah.
The Temple is where the Holy Presence lived,
and where Yahweh promised
that his Holy Presence would never leave.
We really don’t have any concept
for the impact of such a disaster.

If tomorrow our church building would be leveled to the ground,
by a bomb, or tornado, or asteroid,
that would be awful,
but from a religious and spiritual standpoint,
it’s a far cry from the Jews’ loss of the Temple.
Because our theology says this is just a building,
a physical place, an artifact.
It’s not equal to God’s presence.
But the Temple was imbued with Holiness, with Divine Presence,
with the eternal promise of God.
Its destruction would have forced serious doubt
about whether God could be trusted,
or whether God was even still with them.

And again, this was true for mainstream Judaism,
and for Jewish followers of Jesus.

Now . . . one more thing to remember.
We read in the Gospels that after Jesus’ resurrection,
as he ascended to heaven,
Jesus left his followers with a promise.
He said, “I’m coming back, to finish the work we began.
Live as though the Kingdom of God is right around the corner.”

To the ordinary Jewish follower of Jesus,
this meant Jesus would return
to restore the throne of David in Jerusalem.
That he would rule spiritually and politically,
and that the palace and temple would be brought back together,
under one unified Jewish rule,
like in the good old days of David.

So, naturally, seeing how Rome was in the process of destroying it all,
people would be doubting Jesus’ promise.
They might start forgetting Jesus’ life-giving ministry
of love and healing and reconciliation,
and start thinking he was a fraud.

It seems to me this Gospel of Mark
is making every effort to help people keep the faith in Jesus,
and in Jesus’ promise to return to restore life—
full and free and fruitful life.

So this apocalyptic recitation of terrible destruction
on earth and in heaven,
is not meant to scare anyone.
It is meant to say,
these things you see happening all around you
should not undo your faith in God’s loving purposes.
These terrible things are bound to happen,
because the powers of the earth act this way,
with violent destruction and devastation.

I think we read way too much into these words,
if we think God’s intent is to destroy humanity again.
Like this phrase from Mark 13, verse 7—
“When you hear of wars and rumors of wars, do not be alarmed;
this must take place.”
I used to read the words “this must take place,” to mean,
“God will make sure this happens.”
As if Armageddon is God’s idea and God’s plan.
No. The most straightforward reading here,
is that war is the inevitable result of human rebellion and sin.
It’s where systemic violence leads us.
Wars will happen, because that’s the nature of things
when the powers rely on coercion and violence
to exert their will on others . . . which is always.

But—Mark says—but . . . do not give up on God’s promise.
Because God’s purposes are firm.
God’s passion for life is not impacted by human evil.
The God of love always has been, and always will be,
focused on creating life and fruitfulness and shalom.

I don’t know why that core life-giving characteristic of God
isn’t what strikes us first when we read an apocalyptic text like this.
Instead, what seems to loom large in Mark 13
is the picture of destruction, and international warfare,
and earthquake and famine.
That’s not God’s doing.
That’s what’s going on because of human rebellion.

The Gospel word is this,
Take a look around at all these things that are causing pain.
And then think about them as God’s birth pangs.
That’s what it says in v. 8,
“This is but the beginning of the birth pangs.”
This is what it looks like when our mother God
is giving birth again.

Yes, this is all a great metaphor for the persistence of life.

In the beginning, God created life.
God made the earth and its creatures live.
And God’s ruach, God’s spirit-breath,
blew life into humanity.
And God has never stopped doing that.
And will not stop, until the end of all things.
God’s first word and last word is the same word: LIFE.
According to Mark, at the end times, Mother God will still be at it.
Still pushing out life.
Still in the birth pangs of creating life.

The metaphor is taken even further in Mark 13, verse 28.
“From the fig tree learn its lesson:
as soon as its branch becomes tender and puts forth its leaves,
you know that summer is near.
So also, when you see these things taking place,
you know that Jesus, the Son of Man, is near, at the very gates.”
And is bringing life.

That is why we are urged to keep awake—
not to keep us from inadvertently being struck down
by the sword of God’s wrath!
No, no, no!
We keep awake, so we can realize the truth of the matter,
that God is in labor,
and is about to give birth to the life we’ve been waiting for.
We keep awake, so we notice those tiny buds on the fig tree,
and are reassured that the time of life is near.

This is why I love preaching from the apocalyptic writings.
Yes, it’s a strange form of literature for our times.
We rarely read it, and never write that way.
So I get how we misunderstand it.
But I urge us to stop reading it in a way
that makes us worry about God striking us down.
Read it as reassurance of God’s unquenchable commitment to life.
and to the long arc of justice, of shalom,
of all creation being redeemed,
because that’s really the Great Reveal,
in Biblical apocalyptic writing.
God is for life and wholeness. Always.

And why does that make a difference in your life and mine . . . today?
Because living with hope will always get us farther ahead,
then living with fear and despair.
It’s not about turning our back on the terrible things going on.
It’s not about wearing blinders.
It’s about having enough hope still alive in us,
to make us walk toward it.

The March issue of our newsletter, From Across the Fence,
just came out on Thursday.
If you haven’t read it yet, do it soon.
And if you already read it, read it again,
especially the accounts of three households from Park View
who went to our nation’s capital in January
to join other Mennonites from around the country
to protest the war in Gaza, and call for ceasefire,
including, for some, being willing to be arrested
in order to let their voice be heard.
You will see, when you read their stories,
that they did not do that action because they were hopeless.
They did it out of hope in a God who is intent on bringing life,
a God who the Bible compares, in many places,
to a woman in labor.

May we also live our lives with such hope.

Today’s prayer of confession is also a prayer for courage.
Let’s read it together.

one God of all life, we humble ourselves before you
in worship, in gratitude, in repentance.
all As we go into a world filled with 
death, destruction, and despair,
we ask for courage to tell a different story.
one Strengthen us for the task, we pray,
all in the name of the God who creates life,
in the name of the Savior who loves life,
in the name of the Spirit who is the fire of life.

first 5 lines by Phil Kniss
last 3 lines by Philip J. Newell (Scotland), © 2005

—Phil Kniss, March 17, 2024

[To leave a comment, click on "comments" link below]

Sunday, March 3, 2024

Whose head is on it? (Lent 3)

Mark: The Urgent! Gospel
LENT 3: NOW - we are tested for loyalty
Psalm 86:8-13; Mark 12:13-17


Watch the video:


...or listen to audio:


...or download a printer-friendly PDF file [click here]

...or read it online here: 

Kyrie eleison, Lord have mercy on us
as we listen to, reflect on, and live out the Gospel in today’s world.

So many beautiful, moving, and important things in our service today.
The dedication of young lives,
with their parents and us
committing to support and shape those lives.
This powerful Kyrie, still moving us,
200 years after Schubert wrote it.
And soon,
an invitation to gratefully come to the Lord’s Table.

Any of those could stand alone,
but they are tied together beautifully, as one,
by today’s Gospel from Mark 12.

In our journey through Mark, the shortest of the Gospels,
this will be my shortest sermon.

Whose head is on it?
That’s the crucial question Jesus asked his opponents,
when backed him into a corner
to declare loyalty to their agenda.
His opponents here were Pharisees and Herodians,
two parties within Judaism, with different goals,
but both Pharisees and Herodians agreed,
Jesus must make no trouble for Herod or Caesar.
They wanted to accommodate the Empire,
keep the peace,
and not offend those in power.

They asked Jesus whether we should pay tax to Caesar, or not.
Jesus knew their question was bigger than that.
So he gave a bigger answer.
After he got them to identify whose head was on the coin, he said,
“Give to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s
and to God the things that are God’s.”
Clearly, Jesus was talking about more than a silver coin.

That question, “Whose head is on it?”
is a question that still works today.
It’s a way to say,
Whose claim, whose purposes, whose goals are being served
by going along with this particular action
or collective social behavior or belief?
Who has a vested interest in what we do?
Who has their moral imprint on it?

That’s a question we should be asking even more often today,
in our politically polarized world.
“Whose head is on it?”

Whose moral imprint is on the coin of, say,
our culture’s fear of undocumented immigrants?
Whose likeness is on the coin of growing Christian nationalism?
Whose imprint is on the recent backlash
against having open respectful public discussion
on social issues like race, the legacy of slavery, climate change,
the rights of sexual and gender minorities?
Whose claims are being served when we are morally outraged
by Russia’s indiscriminate bombing of Ukraine,
but take a pass when Israel indiscriminately bombs Gaza?
When our leaders to tell them to please bomb a little more carefully,
and then veto ceasefire resolutions?
Isn’t intentional mass killing of children and adults always evil,
no matter who does it?
Every person of faith and goodwill should see that,
and oppose it, every time.

But . . . Caesar’s head is on that coin.
And we don’t want to offend the Empire.
Maybe because we benefit from being part of it.
_____________________

The Gospel of Mark is a gift to us for our time.
The goal of Mark is to bring clarity about who are loyal to—
to the Empires of this world,
or to the Reign of God, embodied in Jesus.

This short and pointed Gospel, aimed at Gentile Roman citizens,
is meant to convince the hearers to take the leap,
and live for the kingdom of heaven, not for the Empire.

In the opening words of the Gospel,
Mark boldly rejected titles Caesar claimed for himself—
divine Savior, and Son of God—
and said, no, those titles belong to Jesus.

Now in chapter 12 we hear it again, in no uncertain terms:
“Give to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s
and to God the things that are God’s.”

That’s a Gospel word for us today.
It seems to me that nearly every choice we are presented in life,
whether those are choices of what to buy, what to consume,
where to live, where to work,
what to do with our time and talents,
what to do with our bodies,
how to vote,
how to treat our immigrant neighbor,
how to run our business,
how to respect those closest to us,
how to honor the dignity of those who are different,
all these choices can be discerned by asking ourselves,
“Whose head is on it?”
Whose agenda is getting a boost by the choice I make?
Is it the Empire?
Or is it God’s Kingdom of Justice and Peace?

Whose moral imprint is on the choice I’m about to make?
Is it the systems of power who operate from the top down,
who depend on coercion to maintain stability,
and keep their hold on power?
Or is it God’s kingdom that starts from the bottom up,
and spreads like mustard plants?
and restores the broken and protects the vulnerable?

In dedicating their children this morning,
two households made a choice.
They came into this space, stood in front of us all,
and said we are part of you, God’s kingdom people.
We are not shaping the future of our child,
on the assumptions of Empire, or of dominant culture,
but on God’s kingdom of justice and peace and love.
And we want you to walk with us and support us
as we do that.

And when we come to the table in a minute,
we will all have another chance to declare our choice,
to pledge our devotion and our allegiance to God’s reign,
by partaking of symbols of the kingdom of Christ—
the bread and cup of suffering, and salvation.

This is why we are here today, doing what we are doing.
May God help us.

—Phil Kniss, March 3, 2024

[To leave a comment, click on "comments" link below]